After his and his wife’s visit with us here in Utah this past summer, a dear Australian friend, upon returning Down Under, was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer - a condition that traditional medicine routinely writes off as incurable and terminal. With nothing better than an “x number of months to live” prognosis from the practitioners of traditional medicine, I have been encouraging my friends to think outside those narrow and dogmatic boundaries and, borrowing a phrase from the Cackling Commie Dingbat Kamala Harris, “imagine what could be, unburdened by what has been” - in this instance “what has been” being the destruction of natural, alternative medicine and the arbitrary construction and focus of the new practice of medicine - John D. Rockefeller’s “allopathic medicine” - based on money and power, rather than the wellbeing of mankind.
In the wake of the Covid pseudo-pandemic and the attendant toxic and deadly mRNA vaccine assault on humanity, the real motives and priorities of the medical/pharmaceutical establishment have been laid bare and renewed attention has been focused on alternative natural medicine - things like high-dose vitamin C - claimed to be, “in sufficiently high doses”, an “absolute virucide” and an “absolute bactericide” - and high-dose vitamin D. One German doctor, Michael Nehls, MD, PhD, author, among other books, of “The Indoctrinate Brain - How to Successfully Fend of the Global Attack on Your Mental Freedom” has asserted, with supporting research documentation, that if the general population had had adequate levels of vitamin D in their blood, Covid mortality would have “approached zero”.
Also getting renewed attention are repurposed, long-established, safe, cheap and effect drugs like Ivermectin - a veterinary medication also effective in Covid treatment and now, along with another veterinary medicine, Fenbendazole, being explored as a very promising cancer treatment that appears in some clinical instances to produce radical improvement and apparent cures.
Faced, as my Aussie friend is, with a terminal diagnosis from traditional medicine, I have encouraged him to consider an Ivermectin/Fenbendazole treatment program as outlined in this video from Dr. John Cambell. Since the drugs are safe and inexpensive, my view is he has nothing to lose and possibly everything to gain.
In response to this encouragement, my friend’s wife just sent me a link to an article from an organization called “AAP Fact Check”, billing itself as “trusted, accurate, impartial”. The article is titled:
“Claims ivermectin is a ‘proven’ cancer treatment are premature”
Here is my response to my friend’s wife:
Thanks for the article.
What nonsense. The whole piece reeks of ulterior motives rather than an honest effort to get at the truth. IMHO, it is an attempt to cast a pall of doubt over Ivermectin as a promising cancer treatment.
I do not think any informed person - certainly not the doctors who have clinical experience with the drug in treating cancer - claims that "Ivermectin is proven to be more effective at treating cancer than chemotherapy". There is presently available regarding Ivermectin as a cancer treatment nowhere near enough experience or information of any kind - including clinical and anecdotal - to justify such an absolute claim for the repurposed drug. In setting up this extreme assertion, the AAP piece, it seems to me, is attempting to cast a pall over Ivermectin as a potentially valuable cancer treatment and deliberately creating a ridiculous strawman they can easily knock down. And they are certainly discouraging those patients - especially terminal patients like my friend - who, notwithstanding the currently limited information, might benefit from Ivermectin treatment.
Remember my oft-repeated little maxim:
The credibility of WHAT you argue is directly a function of HOW you argue. Find the truth in the methodology of argument. The truth cuts its own way and can be argued for in an honest open manner that does not insult the intelligence of those it seeks to persuade. Deceit cannot be so argued.
Keep in mind the arguments supporting Ivermectin repurposed as a cancer treatment are primarily clinical and anecdotal, not supported by “gold-standard”, massive, multi-million-dollar randomized, double-blind clinical studies - studies Big Pharma will never conduct because there is no money in this drug for them - and money is the name of the Big Pharma game. The drug has been around for a long time, is almost certainly out of patent, is safe, and in any case is dirt cheap compared to the poison/cut/burn cancer treatments Big Medicine and Big Pharma promote and make billions on.
If Ivermectin were credibly shown to be an effective cancer treatment on par with or even better than what Big Medicine/Big Pharma promote, it would blow a huge hole in their revenues. Money being the god of this world - and certainly the god of Big Pharma - one does not have to be a rocket scientist to figure out how these people feel about and will orient themselves to a drug like Ivermectin and its claims to be useful in treating things like Covid and cancer.
The toxic, deadly and ineffective Covid vaccines, killing and injuring millions in the process, netted billions for Big Pharma. That is why these demons manipulatively sought to force their untested, deadly concoctions on the whole world and viciously opposed every other form of treatment - like Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, high-dose vitamin C, vitamin D, etc.
Moreover, under the law, if any one of those alternative remedies had proven to be as effective a Covid treatment as their ineffective vaccines, their "emergency use authorization" (EUA) - which enabled them to force their untested, experimental, gene-modifying poisons on the world's populations - would never have been issued. In vigorously opposing and working to discredit all these readily available alternative treatments, Big Pharma was simply protecting their massive vaccine cashflow and didn't really give a diddly-damn about the lives of the people they were - and still are - injuring and killing with their mRNA vaccines.
We have witnessed this same vicious, self-serving Big Pharma mentality regarding high-dose vitamin C over the past 100 years. 80 years ago, prior to the polio vaccine, Dr. Frederick Klenner, MD, was treating and curing viral polio patients with high-dose intravenous vitamin C. His record was perfect. He cured virtually every polio patient he treated. He published and lectured about his results but was totally ignored. Why? For the same reasons vitamin C - again, in sufficiently high doses, claimed to be an "absolute virucide" and an "absolute bactericide" - and other safe, cheap and effective natural remedies and safe drugs like vitamin D and Ivermectin are ignored or ridiculed by the medical/pharmaceutical establishment today - money and power.
These alternative remedies are cheap, safe and clinically effective - a deadly combination for the interests of Big Pharma. Any proposed alternative remedy that is cheap, safe and effective but does more or less the same job as Big Pharma's fabulously expensive and frequently toxic and deadly drugs (properly prescribed and taken prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in America) is anathema to the money-based traditional practice of medicine (“John D. Rockefeller’s allopathic medicine”) and the interests of the pharmaceutical industry that owns that practice, lock, stock and barrel.
Bottom line: push coming to shove, the institutional (not necessarily individual) practice of medicine and its Big Pharma owners do not have as their first priority the health and safety of mankind. As institutions, they are far more concerned about money and power than the lives and wellbeing of their fellow human beings. The Covid pseudo-pandemic and attendant, deadly and ongoing mRNA vaccine assault on mankind blew their cover and have made this truth screamingly clear to anyone with a few firing synapses.
And, applying a little common sense, where do you think "AAP Fact Checkers", the authors of this piece, are positioned in this great contest between truth and deceit?
As concerns your husband’s situation, dealing with advanced pancreatic cancer, you know the traditional medical establishment and their Big Pharma owners have written him off as good as dead. Frankly speaking, their assessment would be measured in "months to live", rather than any possibility of real improvement, to say nothing of a cure. In his circumstances, that word "cure" is simply not in their vocabulary. If you’ll let them, they’ll poison, cut and burn - and charge you or somebody a fortune for it - but never utter the word “cure”.
What, then, have you and your husband got to lose? There appears to be documented clinical evidence that a regimen of Ivermectin and/or Fenbendazole have produced startling improvement and remissions in a wide range of cancers, including pancreatic. The drugs are safe and inexpensive. If I were in your husband’s shoes, I would absolutely have a crack at it.
Best,
RTJ