A friend, having received my recent Substack post titled “The Sabotaging of America and the Rise of Globalism” (wherein I discuss the ongoing deliberate destruction of America to make way for a new dictatorial globalist world order envisioned by the World Economic Forum), forwarded it to a coworker. The coworker wrote the following in response:
“Be careful sending things about the World Economic Form. They are more established than you think. Look around the valley here (the Salt Lake Valley). Most of the new homes/condos are not for sale, only rent. Slavery indeed. And they are taking over HOAs and using those to achieve the same thing. I told you a while back that I couldn't watch the Matrix again, it was far too depressing. Clinton really started the ball rolling here, Obama destroyed the infrastructure and small business, and Biden is tearing down the nation. We've been at war for 30 years and both parties have gone along with it because they get paid so well by the Nazis, the 4th Reich... we might have won WWII, but we didn't destroy the enemy... that's as much as I'll say even on Signal these days...”
Here are my thoughts in response:
I understand that, because I am old and retired, I might be considered to be in a position where I can more readily and publicly speak my mind without fear of personally devasting consequences. I have no job I could arbitrarily be fired from by those who might not like what I believe or have to say, no career that might be attacked and destroyed by ideological enemies, no business that might be "debanked" by those same enemies. We own outright our modest home and our shabby old cars. We have no debt. No lenders have their hooks into us.
(On the subject of debt, have you heard of the book, "The Great Taking"? It discusses the grand scheme that has been put in place and written into international law that will use debt and the coming engineered collapse of the financial system worldwide to strip most people of their assets, concentrate those assets in the hands of an elite few, pauperize the masses and render them no better than serfs who, as the WEF has promised, will "own nothing and be happy". The book is available for download free of charge at thegreattaking.com. Hard copies for $25. I downloaded my copy and printed it out.)
Accordingly, I sympathize with those who, like your coworker, no matter what they actually believe, feel they cannot be seen to oppose the radical woke ideologies that rule in the realms of their employment or other critical spheres of their daily lives... If I were at an earlier stage of life where I had a wife and a houseful of kids to feed and a mortgage payment to make, I might think twice before delivering myself of the degree of frankness and combativeness I now frequently employ. But probably not. I’ve never been inclined to that sort of discretion…
What happens if the people en masse, mostly knowing better, nevertheless allow themselves to be cowed and subdued, as your coworker appears to be? Where does that lead? I'm afraid it leads to things far more monstrous than just the dumbing down of the human mind and spirit.
Imagine, for instance, how many people, knowing better, were complicit in the Big Lies told and still being disseminated by the government/pharmaceutical/medical cabal regarding the Covid pseudo-pandemic and the rollout of the infamous experimental mRNA vaccines (the people were the lab rats) - the latter being a murderous assault on humanity that, by one estimate, has taken 17 million lives with many more still to be lost as vaccine-induced excess death rates (deaths from all causes) inexplicably explode to frightening levels around the world. No one knows the end of it.
I am reminded again of a video presentation I have referred to in the past titled "The Killing of the Mind - Mass Psychosis - How an Entire Population Becomes Mentally Ill". Historically, we saw the German nation under the Nazis succumb to this kind of collective insanity -
- and witnessed the horrendous price Germany and the world paid as a consequence:
The worldwide Covid hysteria provides us a more recent example, proving that such dementia can transcend national boundaries and have a worldwide reach.
The “Killing of the Mind” presentation argues that the only way to confront such collective mania is to stand up and speak the truth. Jordan Petersen has said something similar. He said that, while he might fear the outward consequences of speaking the truth, which he admits from experience can be highly stressful, his greater and overarching fear is what would happen to his soul if he didn't. Jesus famously rhetorically asked, "What does a man profit if he gains the whole world at the cost of his soul? Or what will he give to buy his soul back?"
And consider the examples provided us by brave souls like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Aseem Malhotra (there are many more) who stood up for and spoke the truth freely about the pandemic and the vaccines and have been brutally and unjustly attacked and suppressed by evil adversaries for whom the truth was never a concern.
Another scriptural reference comes to mind here - the occasion where Peter and the other Apostles were called before the Sanhedrin - the group of powerful men who instigated Jesus's death - and were warned by them to stop speaking about Jesus and the resurrection. In the face of the power those evil men had to cause him trouble, Peter answered: "We cannot possibly cease speaking of things we have seen and heard."
Life is a test. The wheat will be separated from the chaff, the sheep from the goats. If one continuously first counts the cost of speaking the truth instead of just speaking it and letting "the consequence follow", one may be at risk of failing that great test. “The truth will out”, as the saying goes, but who will out it? Depending upon one's outlook, one might consider it a blessing to be brought to a place in life where one has the opportunity to stand up for the truth and pay a price for doing so. Clearly the more of us that are willing to do that, the better the chance we'll have of breaking out of the evil tyranny of body, mind and spirit the forces of darkness are seeking to lock down upon us - and vice versa.
Right vs. wrong, truth vs. lies, reality vs. fantasy, law vs. lawlessness, order vs. chaos, liberty vs. tyranny, light vs. darkness, good vs. evil, God vs. the Godless…
You choose… it’s still a free country.
If you can be fooled, you will be.
These are the times that try men’s souls…
Torquemada
That was powerful! Actually, I believe more than 17 million people were affected by the vaccine. Deaths have NOT been reported accurately. While we were on our mission in Thailand (2021-2023),
All of the missionaries had the vaccine. Then boosters were offered and the missionaries received the boosters (we politely refused). Lots of missionaries and Senior couples got Covid. ALL of them had received the vaccine! So the vaccines did NOT stop Covid.
17 million people did not die from covid vaccine. That is incorrect and cannot be derived honestly from the data provided in the original study. This article makes it look like Politics is driving your world view not your faith or rational data analysis.
17 million quote was tracked down to Bret Weinstein, a political commentator and the Epoch times. Both places provided rationale of 17 million people based on a report from Denis Rancourt who supports anti-vaccine groups. In epistemology (how people come to know what they claim to know), we need to understand what may have influenced a study to properly evaluate it. The associated study of people who died "for any reason" during the Covid rollout and did not distinguish between individuals that had the vaccine or not. So, it was flawed to start. Our own data analysis roundly rejects this. If we, using the same data set, can reject the hypothesis presented, we must assume bias in the Denis Rancourt, who is financially and politically motivated, as well as Brett Weinstein. We must exam the Epoch times which has its own religious (Falun Gong) and economic motivations.
Again, if Weinstein has the evidence, where is his paper? Why didn't he publish? As a PhD, he can easily publish his papers on this for review. There are multiple peer reviewed outlets for him to follow up on. He doesn't because he doesn't have the data to support him. We can see this as we have the same datasets he quoted.
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33XF3CN
The founding claim being inaccurate, we are forced to derive the rest of the arguments are based on inaccurate these claims as well. The root cause is a political world view as opposed to faith or rational data analysis.
Normally, I let these comments pass, but my concern is that politics may drive your scientific and religious opinions.