Move Along, Folks... Nothing to See Here...
In another forum, one Trump-hating participant, tacitly acknowledging the decisive violations and manipulations of state election laws in key swing states in the 2020 election, concedes that, yes, we should "make the next election comply with whatever election laws exist, state by state", but then seeks to gloss over the theft of the 2020 election that resulted in large part from the violation of those very state laws. He tells us we should just "get over it."
My response:
Yes, "Let's make the next election comply with whatever laws exist, state by state" and forget the massive 2020 election fraud that stole the presidency from the most effective and successful president in modern times and has flushed the country down the toilet. Get over it! Move on, folks, move on! Nothing to see here!
If you don't know where you've been, you don't know where you're going.
If we don’t understand what happened in the 2020 election, we will be unable to prevent it from happening again.
This same forum contributor also suggests that many compromises of election integrity were made necessary and justifiable because of "the Covid circumstances". What he is conveniently ignoring is that "the Covid circumstances", which facilitated the massively fraud associated with mail-in ballots, were always part of the left’s 2020 election fraud scheme. The whole scale of the pseudo-pandemic and the requisite response was vastly distorted and deliberately overblown precisely to terrorize and cow the population, misdirect their attention and desensitize them to the election fraud that ensued.
It takes a complete fool to believe all these converging factors that impacted the integrity of the 2020 election were random. A great deal was at stake in the 2020 election for the seditious, treasonous, leftist, globalist fifth column Democrats - and though they are evil, they are no fools. Trump was a deadly threat to their lawless interests and had to be stopped. They were well-organized and did a brilliant job of stopping him.
The aforesaid forum participant goes on to tell us "There just is no court that ruled in favor of Trump's numerous specious lawsuits". Here this fellow continues as he always has, with his Trump-hating dim-bulb head planted deeply in the sand. Contrary to the bleatings of his Trump-hating ilk, the fact is, no court ruled at all in essentially any case brought by Trump or in his interest because the courts - gutless wonders that they are - simply found procedural excuses - usually having to do with "standing" - to avoid having to hear the cases at all. Evidence was never considered because the cases were never heard:
Rot in the Bones of America - by Ronald T. Jones - TorqTalk (substack.com)
See the Washington Examiner article below (emphases mine).
Right vs. wrong, truth vs. lies, reality vs. fantasy, law vs. lawlessness, order vs. chaos, courage vs. cowardice, liberty vs. tyranny, light vs. darkness, good vs. evil, life vs. death, God vs. the Godless...
Your turn to choose - and choose you will, one way or another.
If you can be fooled, you will be.
These are the times that try men's souls...
Torquemada
Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out
by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor |
December 16, 2020 03:04 PM
Sen. Rand Paul rejected the idea that courts have "decided the facts" on the integrity of November's presidential election.
“The courts have not decided the facts,” Paul said Wednesday during a hearing on the integrity of the 2020 election. “The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections, and they stayed out of it by finding an excuse.”
Paul pointed out while speaking with former special counsel Ken Starr that 60 court cases involving voter fraud claims in the election were thrown out for procedural reasons, which Starr agreed with, saying that the “vast majority” were thrown out for procedural reasons rather than merit.
Paul also called on state legislatures to “reaffirm” that election law can only be changed by state legislatures, and he suggested that hearings should take place in the future to listen to state legislators and make sure that is happening.
The Kentucky Republican told Starr that this legal aspect should be heard by the courts and stated that roughly two dozen states made changes to when and how ballots are counted against the will of state legislatures.
Starr said election laws were “flagrantly violated” in Pennsylvania, which President Trump’s legal team has vehemently argued, and Paul agreed with that assessment.
“The legal question there is a very easy one to decide,” Paul said. “Even as a physician, I can figure out that the secretary of state cannot create law.”
He added: “I think there is a lot of work to be done.”
Paul’s comments have been echoed by several prominent conservatives, including radio host Mark Levin, who has taken issue with the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear a legal challenge of the 2020 election that was signed by 17 states. [based on "standing"]
Levin also slammed the Supreme Court for not taking up a challenge in Pennsylvania over the constitutional question that Paul and Starr discussed in Wednesday’s hearing.
Levin called the justices on the court “fearful” of the political repercussions of hearing the case and accused them of “ducking under the proverbial table.”